benco V8 vs Nokia C200 Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of benco V8 and Nokia C200

Selected Mobiles

benco V8
benco V8

Brand:

Model:

Nokia C200
Nokia C200

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $122.00 $109.00
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Smartphone Smartphone
Status Available Available
SIM Type Nano SIM Nano SIM TF card --
Network ME/BD/NP/TH/IDR
2G : 900/1800 MHz
3G : 900/2100 MHz
4G/FDD : Band1/3/5/7/8
Max network speed : 4G
Network bands (GSM) : 850, 1900
Network bands (LTE) : 2, 4, 5, 12, 13, 41, 66, 71, 2xCA
Network bands (WCDMA) : 2, 4, 5
Operating System Star OS 5.1 based on Android 9 Pie Android 12
Processor GPU : Mali G71, MediaTek MT6763, Octa-core MTK A22 quad core 2.0GHz
In The Box -- Charger USB Type C Cable Quick Start Guide
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 163.2 x 77.8 x 8.9 mm 156.45 x 73.14 x 8.75 mm
Weight 186 g 172.5 g
Display
Size 6.53 6.088 inch
Resolution HD + 1560x720 HD+ (720 x 1560)
Other Features -- Aspect ratio :19.5:9 Cover glass : 2.5D toughened glass
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 32GB 32 GB
External Memory Expandable to 256GB MicroSD card support up to : 256 GB
RAM 2GB, 3GB 3 GB
Battery
Type 4000mAh Li-poly (Typical value) 4000 mAh, Non Removable
Stand-by Time 816h --
Video Playback 9.6h --
Audio Playback 35h --
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 16MP 2MP 2MP, f/1.7 f/2.4 f/2.4, back flash 13 MP AF Rear flash LED
Secondary Camera(Front) 8MP, f/2.0 8 MP, FF
Data & Connectivity
GPRS -- --
Bluetooth -- 5.0
USB -- USB Type-C (USB 2.0) OTG
Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n 802.11 b/g/n/ac
Multimedia
Music Player 3gp, .aac, .amr, .flac, .m4a, .mp3, .mid, .ogg, .ts, .wav --
Messaging
SMS -- --
Features
Java -- --
Sensors G-sensor
Light-sensor
Proximity-sensor
Accelerometer (G-sensor)
Ambient light sensor
Barometer
Proximity sensor
Additional Features -- Headphone jack : 3.5 mm
Location : GPS/AGPS

Audio
Features : FM radio
Microphones : 2
Speakers : 1

Security : Face Unlock
Colors Available
Colors Coral Orange, Sea Blue --


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6233