Hitech Amaze S330 vs Karbonn Alfa 112 Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of Hitech Amaze S330 and Karbonn Alfa 112

Selected Mobiles

Hitech Amaze S330
Hitech Amaze S330

Brand:

Model:

Karbonn Alfa 112
Karbonn Alfa 112

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price Not Available $33.32
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Smartphone Smartphone
Status Discontinued Discontinued
SIM Type Dual Sim Dual SIM (GSM+GSM)
Network 2G Network: GSM 900 / 1800 MHz 2G Network: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
Operating System Android OS, v2.3.5 (Gingerbread) Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
Processor 1 GHz 1 GHz Single core
Form Factor Candybar Candy bar
In The Box Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card Handset, Battery, Charger, User Manual, Warranty Card
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 126.7 x 64.5 x 10.6 mm 122.7 x 65 x 10.6 mm
Weight -- g 113 g
Display
Size 4.0 inches (~233 ppi) 4.0 inches (~ 233 ppi)
Technology TFT Capacitive Touchscreen TFT capacitive touchscreen
Resolution 480 x 800 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
Colors 16 M --
Other Features Multi-Touch --
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 512 MB 512 MB
External Memory microSD, up to 32 GB Yes, Up to 32 GB via microSD
RAM 256 MB 256 MB
Battery
Type Li-Ion 1500 mAh Battery Li-Po 1300 mAh battery
Talk Time Up to 8 hours Up to 3.8 Hours(2G)
Stand-by Time -- Up to 180 Hours(2G)
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 2 MP 2 MP with LED flash
Secondary Camera(Front) 0.3 MP 0.3 MP
Digital/Optical Zoom Yes, Digital Digital Zoom
Video Yes --
Data & Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes --
Bluetooth Yes Yes
USB Yes, microUSB v2.0 USB Port, microUSB 2.0
Wi-Fi Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Mobile Hotspot
Multimedia
Music Player Yes, Supports MP3, AMR, AAC, WMA --
MP3 Ringtone Yes Yes
LoudSpeaker Yes Yes
Video Player Yes, Supports 3GP, MP4, AVI, H.264, H.263 --
Video recording Yes --
Messaging
SMS Yes Yes
Features
Java -- No
Sensors -- Accelerometer
FM Radio Yes --
Colors Available
Colors Black, White Black


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3120