iVooMi iV505 vs Micromax Bolt S302 Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of iVooMi iV505 and Micromax Bolt S302

Selected Mobiles

iVooMi iV505
iVooMi iV505

Brand:

Model:

Micromax Bolt S302
Micromax Bolt S302

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $71.65 $57.48
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Smartphone Smartphone
Status Discontinued Discontinued
SIM Type Dual SIM (Micro-SIM) Dual SIM (GSM+GSM)
Network 2G Bands: GSM 1800 / 1900 / 900 MHz
3G Bands: UMTS 2100 / 850 MHz
4G Bands:TD-LTE 2300(band 40), FD-LTE 2100(band 1) / 1800(band 3) / 900(band 8) / 850(band 5)
2G Network: GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
3G Network: UMTS 2100 / 900 MHz
Operating System Android v6.0 (Marshmallow) Android v4.4.3 (Kitkat)
Processor Quad-core (1.3 GHz Cortex A7) Spreadtrum SC9832A 1 GHz Single core Spreadrum 6610
Form Factor -- Candy bar
In The Box -- Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 145.5 x 72.9 x 9.8 mm --
Display
Size 5.0 inches (~220 ppi) 4.0 inches (~233 ppi)
Technology IPS LCD capacitive touchscreen TFT capacitive touchscreen
Resolution 540 x 960 pixels 480 x 800 pixels
Other Features Multi-touch --
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 8 GB 4 GB
External Memory Up to 128 GB Yes, Up to 32 GB via microSD
RAM 1 GB 512 MB
Battery
Type Li-Ion 3000 mAh battery Li-ion 1450 mAh battery
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 5 MP with LED Flash 2 MP with LED flash
Secondary Camera(Front) 5 MP 1.3 MP
Digital/Optical Zoom Digital Zoom Digital Zoom
Data & Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes Yes
3G Yes Yes
4G Yes --
Bluetooth Yes, v4.0 v2.1
USB Yes, microUSB 2.0 USB Port, microUSB 2.0
Wi-Fi Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n, Wi-Fi hotspot Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n
GPS Yes Yes, with A-GPS
Multimedia
Music Player -- --
MP3 Ringtone -- Yes
LoudSpeaker Yes Yes
Messaging
SMS -- Yes
MMS -- Yes
Email -- Yes
Features
Java -- No
Sensors Light sensor, Proximity sensor, Accelerometer --
FM Radio -- Yes
Colors Available
Colors Black, Champagne Grey


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

191