Vodafone Chat 655 vs Yezz Bono 3G Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of Vodafone Chat 655 and Yezz Bono 3G

Selected Mobiles

Vodafone Chat 655
Vodafone Chat 655

Brand:

Model:

Yezz Bono 3G
Yezz Bono 3G

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $86.67 $60.00
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Feature Phone Feature Phone
Status Available Available
SIM Type Mini-SIM Dual SIM (Mini-SIM)
Network 2G Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G Network HSDPA 2100
2G Network GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1
GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 2
3G Network UMTS 850 / 1900 - SIM 1 only
Browser HTML WAP
Form Factor Bar Bar
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 112 x 61.1 x 11 mm 110.8 x 60 x 12.4 mm
Weight 104 g 68 g
Display
Size 2.4 inches 2.0 inches
Technology TFT TFT
Resolution 320 x 240 pixels 220 x 176 pixels
Colors -- 256K
Other Features 167 ppi pixel density --
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 64 MB --
External Memory microSD, up to 16 GB microSD, up to 32 GB (two slots)
Battery
Type Li-Ion battery Li-Ion 1000 mAh battery
Talk Time Up to 5 h Up to 4 h
Stand-by Time Up to 509 h Up to 180 h
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 2 MP 1.3 MP
Secondary Camera(Front) No No
Resolution 1600 x 1200 pixels 1280 x 1024 pixels
Video Yes Yes
Features Geo-tagging --
Data & Connectivity
GPRS Yes Yes
EDGE Yes Up to 60 kbps
3G Yes, HSDPA Yes, 384 kbps
Bluetooth Yes Yes, v2.0
USB Yes, v2.0 Yes, microUSB
Wi-Fi Yes --
GPS Yes --
Multimedia
Music Player MP3 player Yes
MP3 Ringtone Yes Yes
LoudSpeaker Yes Yes
Video Player MP4/H.263 player Yes
Video recording Yes Yes
Messaging
SMS Yes Yes
MMS Yes Yes
Email Yes --
Instant Messaging Yes Yes
Features
Java Yes --
FM Radio Yes Stereo FM radio
FM Radio recording -- Yes
Additional Features OS level SNS integration, Organizer, Voice memo, Photo viewer and Predictive text input. Facebook, Yahoo, MSN, Twitter and Organizer.
Colors Available
Colors Gray Red, Blue, Purple, Black, White


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name:

Comment:

4175 Enter the numbers here: