EVERCOSS Xtream 2 Prime vs Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of EVERCOSS Xtream 2 Prime and Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus

Selected Mobiles

EVERCOSS Xtream 2 Prime
EVERCOSS Xtream 2 Prime

Brand:

Model:

Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus
Samsung Galaxy Star 2 Plus

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $150.00 $122.25
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Smartphone Smartphone
Status Available Discontinued
SIM Type -- Dual Sim
Network -- 2G Network: GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
Operating System Android 8.1 Oreo Android OS, v4.4.2 (KitKat)
Processor Octa Core 1.6 GHz 1.2 GHz Cortex-A9
Browser -- HTML5
Form Factor -- Candybar
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 157.6 x 77.2 x 11.5 mm 129.7 x 65.9 x 9.4 mm
Weight 131 g -- g
Display
Size 6.0 Inch 4.3 inches (~217 ppi)
Technology -- TFT Capacitive Touchscreen
Resolution 480 * 996 Pixels 480 x 800 pixels
Colors -- 16 M
Other Features -- Multi-Touch
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 16 GB 4 GB
External Memory MICRO SD UP TO 64 GB microSD, up to 32 GB
RAM 2 GB 512 MB
Battery
Type 2650 mAh Li-Ion 1800 mAh Battery
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 8 MP 3 MP with LED Flash
Secondary Camera(Front) 5 MP No
Resolution -- 2048 x 1536 pixels
Digital/Optical Zoom -- Yes, Digital
Video -- Yes
Features -- Geo-tagging
Data & Connectivity
GPRS -- Yes
EDGE -- Yes
Bluetooth -- Yes, v4.0 with A2DP
USB -- Yes, microUSB v2.0
Wi-Fi -- Yes, Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi hotspot
GPS -- Yes, with A-GPS support and GLONASS
HDMI Port -- No
Multimedia
Music Player -- Yes, Supports MP3, AMR, AAC, WMA
MP3 Ringtone -- Yes
Poly Ringtone -- Yes
LoudSpeaker -- Yes
Video Player -- Yes, Supports 3GP, MP4, AVI, H.264, H.263
Video recording -- Yes
Messaging
SMS -- Yes
MMS -- Yes
Email -- Yes
Push mail -- Yes
Instant Messaging -- Yes
Features
Java -- Yes, via Java MIDP emulator
Sensors GPS
3D Gravity Sensor
Proximity Sensor
Accelerometer
FM Radio -- Yes
Colors Available
Colors Galaxy Blue, Galaxy Violet Black, White


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1513