Evertek M20 Plus Pro vs Lenovo A536 Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of Evertek M20 Plus Pro and Lenovo A536

Selected Mobiles

Evertek M20 Plus Pro
Evertek M20 Plus Pro

Brand:

Model:

Lenovo A536
Lenovo A536

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $77.00 $94.33
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Smartphone Smartphone
Status Available Discontinued
SIM Type -- Dual SIM
Network -- 2G Network: GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G Network: HSDPA 900 / 2100
Operating System Android R (GO Edition) Android v4.4.2 (kitkat)
Processor MT6761D 1.8G Quad Core 1.3 GHz Quad-core MediaTek MTK 6582 Processor
Browser -- HTML5
Form Factor -- Candy Bar
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) -- 139.6 x 72 x 10 mm
Weight -- g 148 g
Display
Size 6.09 5 Inches (~196 ppi)
Technology HD+IPS Waterdrop Capacitive Touchscreen
Resolution -- 480 x 854 pixels
Colors -- 16M
Other Features TPU+Tempered Glass 19.5:9 Full Screen 2.5D Smartphone Multitouch
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 32GB 8 GB
External Memory -- MicroSD, upto 32 GB
RAM 2GB 1 GB
Battery
Type 3000mah Battery Li-Po 2000 mAh battery
Talk Time -- Up to 15 h 30 min (2G) , Up to 12 hrs (3G)
Stand-by Time -- Up to 300 hrs (2G) , Up to 300 hrs (3G)
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) 8M AF Camera 5 MP with LED Flash
Secondary Camera(Front) 8MP 2 MP
Resolution -- 2592 х 1944 pixels
Video -- Yes
Features -- Autofocus, Geo-tagging
Data & Connectivity
GPRS -- Yes
EDGE -- Yes
3G -- HSDPA, 21 Mbps; HSUPA, 5.76 Mbps
4G -- No
Bluetooth -- Yes, v4.0
USB -- Yes, microUSB v2.0
Wi-Fi -- Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi hotspot
GPS -- Yes, with A-GPS Support
Multimedia
Music Player -- Yes, Supports MP3, WAV, eAAC+
MP3 Ringtone -- Yes
Poly Ringtone -- Yes
LoudSpeaker -- Yes
Video Player -- Yes, Supports MP4, H.264, H.263
Messaging
SMS -- Yes
MMS -- Yes
Email -- Yes
Push mail -- Yes
Instant Messaging -- Yes
Features
Java -- Yes, via Java MIDP emulator
Sensors -- Accelerometer, Proximity
FM Radio -- Yes
Colors Available
Colors -- White, Black


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1581