Nokia 105 (2017) vs Samsung Rex 60 Duos GT-C3312 Comparison

Compare Specification and Price of Nokia 105 (2017) and Samsung Rex 60 Duos GT-C3312

Selected Mobiles

Nokia 105 (2017)
Nokia 105 (2017)

Brand:

Model:

Samsung Rex 60 Duos GT-C3312
Samsung Rex 60 Duos GT-C3312

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Price $16.65 $56.15
Pros and Cons
Pros -- --
Cons -- --


Overview
Class Feature Phone Feature Phone
Status Discontinued Discontinued
SIM Type Single SIM or Dual SIM (Mini-SIM) Dual Sim (GSM+GSM)
Network 2G Network: GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 (dual-SIM model only) 2G GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
Operating System Nokia Series 30+ Propriatary
Browser No Opera Mini Browser
Form Factor -- Candybar
In The Box Handset, Quick start guide, Micro-USB charger, Charging/data cable --
Physical Dimensions
Dimension (HxWxD) 112 x 49.5 x 14.4 mm 101.8 x 55 x 12.5 mm
Weight 73 g -- g
Display
Size 1.8 Inches (~143 ppi) 2.8 inches
Technology TFT QVGA Responsive TFT
Resolution QVGA, 120 x 160 Pixels 240 x 320 pixels
Colors 65K 65K
Memory and Storage
Internal Memory 4MB 30 MB
External Memory No microSD, up to 16 GB
RAM 4 MB --
Battery
Type Removable Li-Ion 800 mAh Battery Li-Ion 1000 mAh battery
Talk Time Upto 15 Hours Up to 15 h
Stand-by Time Upto 1 Month --
Camera
Primary Camera(Rear) No 1.3 MP
Secondary Camera(Front) -- No
Resolution -- 1280 x 1024 pixels
Video -- Yes.
Data & Connectivity
GPRS No Yes
EDGE No Yes
Bluetooth No Yes, v3.0
USB Yes, microUSB 2.0 (charging only) Yes, microUSB v2.0, USB Host
Wi-Fi No --
GPS No No
Multimedia
Music Player No MP3/eAAC+ player
MP3 Ringtone Yes --
Poly Ringtone Yes --
LoudSpeaker Yes --
Video Player No MP4/H.263 player
Messaging
SMS Yes Yes
MMS No Yes
Email No Yes
Push mail No --
Instant Messaging No Yes
Features
Java No Yes
Sensors -- Proximity
FM Radio Yes --
Additional Features Flashlight
Pre-loaded Snake Xenzia game
Nokia Series 30+ software platform
3.5mm Audio Jack
--
Colors Available
Colors Black, Blue, White White, Gray, Blue


Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5306